Monográfico sobre alienación parental de los niños del divorcio

Family Court Review, Enero 2010, Volumen 48, Número 1, Páginas 1-245.

1. Editorial Notes

1.Top of page

2.Editorial Notes

3.Special Guest Editors’ Editorial Notes

4.Articles

5.Perspectives

6.Student Notes

JANUARY 2010 (pages 1–5)

Andrew Schepard

1. 2. Special Guest Editors’ Editorial Notes

1.Top of page

2.Editorial Notes

3.Special Guest Editors’ Editorial Notes

4.Articles

5.Perspectives

6.Student Notes

GUEST EDITORS’ INTRODUCTION TO SPECIAL ISSUE ON ALIENATED CHILDREN IN DIVORCE AND SEPARATION: EMERGING APPROACHES FOR FAMILIES AND COURTS (pages 6–9)

Barbara Jo Fidler and Nicholas Bala

CHILDREN RESISTING POSTSEPARATION CONTACT WITH A PARENT: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES, AND CONUNDRUMS (pages 10–47)

Barbara Jo Fidler and Nicholas Bala

FAMILY BRIDGES: USING INSIGHTS FROM SOCIAL SCIENCE TO RECONNECT PARENTS AND ALIENATED CHILDREN* (pages 48–80)

Richard A. Warshak

COMMENTARY ON “FAMILY BRIDGES: USING INSIGHTS FROM SOCIAL SCIENCE TO RECONNECT PARENTS AND ALIENATED CHILDREN” (WARSHAK, 2010) (pages 81–90)

Joan B. Kelly

HELPING ALIENATED CHILDREN WITH FAMILY BRIDGES: PRACTICE, RESEARCH, AND THE PURSUIT OF “HUMBITION” (pages 91–97)

Richard A. Warshak and Mark R. Otis

WHEN A CHILD REJECTS A PARENT: TAILORING THE INTERVENTION TO FIT THE PROBLEM (pages 98–111)

Steven Friedlander and Marjorie Gans Walters

OUTCOMES OF FAMILY COUNSELING INTERVENTIONS WITH CHILDREN WHO RESIST VISITATION: AN ADDENDUM TO FRIEDLANDER AND WALTERS (2010) (pages 112–115)

Janet R. Johnston and Judith Roth Goldman

OVERCOMING BARRIERS FAMILY CAMP:A PROGRAM FOR HIGH-CONFLICT DIVORCED FAMILIES WHERE A CHILD IS RESISTING CONTACT WITH A PARENT (pages 116–135)

Matthew J. Sullivan, Peggie A. Ward and Robin M. Deutsch

EARLY IDENTIFICATION AND PREVENTION OF PARENT–CHILD ALIENATION: A FRAMEWORK FOR BALANCING RISKS AND BENEFITS OF INTERVENTION (pages 136–152)

Peter G. Jaffe, Dan Ashbourne and Alfred A. Mamo

ALIENATING AUDIENCES FROM INNOVATION: THE PERILS OF POLEMICS, IDEOLOGY, AND INNUENDO (pages 153–163)

Richard A. Warshak

PARENTAL ALIENATION: CANADIAN COURT CASES 1989–2008 (pages 164–179)

Nicholas Bala, Suzanne Hunt and Carolyn McCarney

ONE CASE–ONE SPECIALIZED JUDGE: WHY COURTS HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO MANAGE ALIENATION AND OTHER HIGH-CONFLICT CASES (pages 180–189)

Donna J. Martinson

7.Top of page

8.Editorial Notes

9.Special Guest Editors’ Editorial Notes

10.Articles

11.Perspectives

12.Student Notes

A RESPONSE TO PETER SALEM’S ARTICLE“THE EMERGENCE OF TRIAGE IN FAMILY COURT SERVICES: BEGINNING OF THE END FOR MANDATORY MEDIATION” (pages 190–194)

Hugh McIsaac

A REPONSE TO SALEM: COMMON SENSE (pages 195–200)

Steve Baron

A DISTINCTION WITHOUT MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE: RESPONSE TO STEVE BARON AND HUGH MCISAAC (pages 201–205)

Peter Salem

FINE TUNING THE BRANDING OF PARENTING COORDINATION: “. . . YOU MAY GET WHAT YOU NEED” (pages 206–211)

Elayne E. Greenberg

13.Top of page

14.Editorial Notes

15.Special Guest Editors’ Editorial Notes

16.Articles

17.Perspectives

18.Student Notes

A CALL TO CONGRESS TO GIVE BACK THE FUTURE: END THE “WAR ON DRUGS” AND ENCOURAGE STATES TO RECONSTRUCT THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM (pages 212–227)

Christina M. Gaudio

LIFE AFTER DEATH: THE NEED TO ADDRESS THE LEGAL STATUS OF POSTHUMOUSLY CONCEIVED CHILDREN (pages 228–245)

Jenna M. F. Suppon

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.2010.48.issue-1/issuetoc